Disgraced Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes Accused Of Trying To Wrangle 'Jurors That Fit A Certain Profile She Considers Favorable'
June 8 2021, Published 10:45 a.m. ET
Disgraced Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes is being accused of trying to secure a jury that's biased in her favor after her defense team proposed that potential jurors fill out a 41-page questionnaire containing 112 questions about topics like employment, language fluency, marital status and more.
While they acknowledged that their version was "lengthy," Holmes' attorneys tried to convince Judge Edward Davila – who is presiding over her case in San Jose U.S. District Court – that many of the questions in their proposed jury-screening form were routine, adding that "the substantial media coverage of the matter and the continuing COVID-19 pandemic" required "special inquiry."
Responding with a letter filed in court last week, prosecutors argued that the unusually long proposal "does more to potentially bias the jury in her favor than to aid in selecting a fair and impartial jury representing a cross-section of the local public."
They believe many of the questions posed in Holmes' proposed document – including queries about personal investments, health insurance and social media use – are "untethered" from the coronavirus pandemic and any pretrial publicity.
The list of questions, they say, "appears designed … to isolate jurors that fit a certain profile she considers favorable."
"Tellingly," they added, "the two main rationales (Holmes) asserts for justifying such an exce