Penis Amputee Plans Appeal – Terrified Surgeon Will Ruin Someone Else’s Life
Aug. 25 2011, Published 7:00 a.m. ET
By Breaking Celebrity News Staff
[expletive] amputee Phillip Seaton is planning to appeal after losing his case against a doctor who removed a portion of his manhood without his permission during a routine circumcision.
The 64-year-old was left “disappointed” yesterday when a jury in Shelby County, Kentucky unanimously voted that Dr. John Patterson exercised appropriate care during the operation in October 2007.
But Seaton’s lawyer Kevin George told Breaking Celebrity News exclusively that “justice was not served” because his client “did not need to have his [expletive] amputated.
“He should have been given the option of getting a second opinion and not have his [expletive] taken away without his consent. He should have been allowed to have a functioning [expletive] with reconstructive surgery and not to just have his [expletive] amputated,” George declared.
The lawyer said that he was also left fearful by the verdict because he and his client are concerned that the same thing could happen again.
"The idea that a doctor can get consent for a minor surgery like a circumcision and then go and use that consent as an authority to amputate a guy’s [expletive] is scary,” George said.
The jury are thought to have been swayed because Seaton, who cannot read